Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 23(1): 647, 2023 Jun 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37328877

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing focus on the development of research capacity and culture in Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions (NMAHP). However, better understanding of the existing research success and skills, motivators, barriers, and development needs of NMAHP professionals is required to inform this development. This study sought to identify such factors within a university and an acute healthcare organisation. METHODS: An online survey, incorporating the Research Capacity and Culture tool, was administered to NMAHP professionals and students at a university and an acute healthcare organisation in the United Kingdom. Ratings of success/skill levels of teams and individuals were compared between professional groups using Mann-Whitney U tests. Motivators, barriers, and development needs were reported using descriptive statistics. Descriptive thematic analysis was used for open-ended text responses. RESULTS: A total of 416 responses were received (N&M n = 223, AHP n = 133, Other n = 60). N&M respondents were more positive than their AHP counterparts about the success/skill levels of their teams. There were no significant differences between N&M and AHP in their ratings of individual successes/skills. Finding and critically reviewing relevant literature were identified as specific individual strengths; with weaknesses in securing research funding, submitting ethics applications, writing for publication, and advising less experienced researchers. The main motivators for research were to develop skills, increased job satisfaction, and career advancement; whilst barriers included lack of time for research and other work roles taking priority. Key support needs identified included mentorship (for teams and individuals) and in-service training. Open-ended questions generated main themes of 'Employment & staffing', 'Professional services support', 'Clinical & academic management', 'Training & development', 'Partnerships' and 'Operating principles'. Two cross-cutting themes described issues common to multiple main themes: 'Adequate working time for research' and 'Participating in research as an individual learning journey'. CONCLUSIONS: Rich information was generated to inform the development of strategies to enhance research capacity and culture in NMAHP. Much of this can be generic but some nuances may be required to address some specific differences between professional groups, particularly related to perceived team success/skills and priorities identified for support and development.


Asunto(s)
Partería , Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Universidades , Técnicos Medios en Salud , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Atención a la Salud
2.
J Crit Care ; 30(5): 901-7, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26004031

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Patients recovering from critical illness may be left with significant muscle mass loss. This study aimed to evaluate whether a 6-week program of enhanced physiotherapy and structured exercise (PEPSE) and an essential amino acid supplement drink (glutamine and essential amino acid mixture [GEAA]) improves physical and psychological recovery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intensive care patients aged 45 years or older, with a combined intensive care unit stay/pre-intensive care unit stay of 5 days or more were recruited to a randomized controlled trial examining the effect of PEPSE and GEAA on recovery. The 2 factors were tested in a 2 × 2 factorial design: (1) GEAA drink twice daily for 3 months and (2) 6-week PEPSE in first 3 months. Primary efficacy outcome was an improvement in the 6-minute walking test at 3 months. RESULTS: A total of 93 patients were randomized to the study. Patients receiving the PEPSE and GEA had the biggest gains in distance walked in 6-minute walking test (P < .0001). There were also significant reductions in rates of anxiety in study groups control supplement/PEPSE (P = .047) and GEAA supplement/PEPSE (P = .036) and for GEAA supplement/PEPSE in depression (P = .0009). CONCLUSION: Enhanced rehabilitation combined with GEAA supplement may enhance physical recovery and reduce anxiety and depression.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/métodos , Aminoácidos Esenciales/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Crítica/rehabilitación , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Análisis de Varianza , Ansiedad/prevención & control , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Depresión/prevención & control , Suplementos Dietéticos , Método Doble Ciego , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Femenino , Glutamina/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Caminata/fisiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA